2 ms·
Let’s say India did pursue these people on Canadian soil. Is it their reputation that is hurt or that of Canada? It’s well documented that the remaining adheren
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
Let’s say India did pursue these people on Canadian soil. Is it their reputation that is hurt or that of Canada? It’s well documented that the remaining adherents of the violent Khalistani separatist movement fled India and found a home in Canada. A lot of the Sikh population in Canada supports that movement. You could look at them as people fighting for sovereignty but you can also look at them as a far more violent version of the groups involved in Jan 6 in the US or Jan 8 in Brazil, since they were threatening the sovereignty of India and were responsible for many terrorist attacks.
That same group ended up being responsible for bombing a civilian airliner (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182) leaving Canada with hundreds of Canadians on board. The follow up to this horrific incident was disappointing:
> The subsequent investigation and prosecution lasted almost twenty years. This was the most expensive trial in Canadian history, costing nearly C$130 million. The two accused, Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri, were both acquitted and found not guilty.
> The Governor General-in-Council in 2006 appointed the former Supreme Court Justice John C. Major to conduct a commission of inquiry. His report, which was completed and released on 17 June 2010, concluded that a "cascading series of errors" by the Government of Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had allowed the terrorist attack to take place.
Given all this history, to me it is utterly bizarre that Trudeau cares to defend this dubious group of alleged terrorists more than maintaining diplomatic and economic ties with India. I think it is a huge mistake because we need India as an ally to keep China in check. He knows this, I’m sure. So what’s his motivation? Where does this road end and at what cost?
- science4sail 2y ago> Given all this history, to me it is utterly bizarre that Trudeau cares to defend this dubious group of alleged terrorists more than maintaining diplomatic and economic ties with India Setting aside the morality of who is right or wrong: my understanding is that just like in the USA, domestic politics are far more important to Canadian politicians than geopolitical concerns. Trudeau likely feels that he and his political coalition cannot afford to alienate Khalistani supporters - if they do so, then they will lose political power until a new coalition can be formed.
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoCan you explain the bit about the coalition? Is that a formal concept in Canadian politics? Or are you just saying that without that support he will not get reelected?