I'm not sure -- I think that would depend on whether the EPA is statutorily enabled to research and issue public health determinations on water fluoridation, or

I'm not sure -- I think that would depend on whether the EPA is statutorily enabled to research and issue public health determinations on water fluoridation, or whether that scope has been established indirectly via deference. But given that the statue in this case specifically enables compelling the EPA to re-conduct reviews, I don't think CD is an immediate concern.