5 ms·

Ugh, that bezel. Will full coverage screens with a software driven, virtual bezel every be a thing?

gjsman-1000 2y ago
Ugh, my batteries need recharging. Will nuclear powered phones with built-in fusion reactors that never need recharging ever be a thing?
- ClassyJacket 2y ago
  An edge to edge screen is entirely technically feasible tho. The iPhone has it.
alpaca128 2y ago
I don't get why some people get so worked up about bezels. I like being able to hold my devices without accidental inputs, and to me they look better anyway. I wouldn't mind 3cm wide bezels and accordingly larger batteries.
- hnburnsy 2y ago
  Virtual bezels and let the user choosing.
  - cut3 2y ago
    Dynamically get larger as battery life decreases
  - alpaca128 2y ago
    And pay for a screen size I won't use? No, thanks.
    - hnburnsy 2y ago
      Could be dynamic, example, watching a movie, no bezels. Remove the bezels from the top and/or bottom, that changes on the device orientation. Placed in a stand remove the bezels, add them back when picked up.
      - lucb1e 2y ago
        That sounds awesome actually. Makes me wonder how hard it would be on a rooted phone to just have it tell the software the screen is a few pixels smaller so you can touch chose sides safely, and remove the restriction again when you're in movie mode Never heard of anyone making that but this would honestly sound like the first innovation in several years, not incremental like "GPS now finds a solution 2 seconds faster" and "the mobile data now uses 7% less energy" but something that is now possible that wasn't a feature before
      - alpaca128 2y ago
        So what mechanism would you suggest to reliably detect when I want to pick it up so it adds the bezels before I'm able to cause any accidental input?
    - jojobas 2y ago
      Imagining that with Apple you're paying for the screen size is a bit rich.
fckgw 2y ago
iPads need to have some sort of bezel, else how are you going to hold the thing? iPhones you can grip the sides, iPads not so much.
- michpoch 2y ago
  iPhone 16 pro max is almost there with the screen size, also a two-hands device
- lucb1e 2y ago
  This. Phones are already a real trade-off between usability and screen size. I've reached (or perhaps slightly gone over) the minimum amount of grabbing space I want on a phone and mine isn't quite the sleekest model
ClassyJacket 2y ago
I was just thinking the same thing. Why couldn't they give it a tiny bezel, with a software option to put a virtual bezel if you want to hold it in a way it matters. They could even give it only the virtual bezel on the left and right sides, in whichever orientation you're holding it, since you don't really hold it on the top or bottom.

Ugh, my batteries need recharging. Will nuclear powered phones with built-in fusion reactors that never need recharging ever be a thing?

ClassyJacket 2y ago
An edge to edge screen is entirely technically feasible tho. The iPhone has it.

alpaca128 2y ago

I don't get why some people get so worked up about bezels. I like being able to hold my devices without accidental inputs, and to me they look better anyway. I wouldn't mind 3cm wide bezels and accordingly larger batteries.

hnburnsy 2y ago
Virtual bezels and let the user choosing.
- cut3 2y ago
  Dynamically get larger as battery life decreases
- alpaca128 2y ago
  And pay for a screen size I won't use? No, thanks.
  - hnburnsy 2y ago
    Could be dynamic, example, watching a movie, no bezels. Remove the bezels from the top and/or bottom, that changes on the device orientation. Placed in a stand remove the bezels, add them back when picked up.
    - lucb1e 2y ago
      That sounds awesome actually. Makes me wonder how hard it would be on a rooted phone to just have it tell the software the screen is a few pixels smaller so you can touch chose sides safely, and remove the restriction again when you're in movie mode Never heard of anyone making that but this would honestly sound like the first innovation in several years, not incremental like "GPS now finds a solution 2 seconds faster" and "the mobile data now uses 7% less energy" but something that is now possible that wasn't a feature before
    - alpaca128 2y ago
      So what mechanism would you suggest to reliably detect when I want to pick it up so it adds the bezels before I'm able to cause any accidental input?
  - jojobas 2y ago
    Imagining that with Apple you're paying for the screen size is a bit rich.

fckgw 2y ago

iPads need to have some sort of bezel, else how are you going to hold the thing? iPhones you can grip the sides, iPads not so much.

michpoch 2y ago
iPhone 16 pro max is almost there with the screen size, also a two-hands device
lucb1e 2y ago
This. Phones are already a real trade-off between usability and screen size. I've reached (or perhaps slightly gone over) the minimum amount of grabbing space I want on a phone and mine isn't quite the sleekest model

ClassyJacket 2y ago

I was just thinking the same thing. Why couldn't they give it a tiny bezel, with a software option to put a virtual bezel if you want to hold it in a way it matters. They could even give it only the virtual bezel on the left and right sides, in whichever orientation you're holding it, since you don't really hold it on the top or bottom.