3 ms·
It's sad that "ultraportable iPad" marketing works, but "ultraportable iPhone" does not make sense for most people. iPhone 13 mini was the last flagship smartp
by ivanjermakov 2y ago
It's sad that "ultraportable iPad" marketing works, but "ultraportable iPhone" does not make sense for most people.
iPhone 13 mini was the last flagship smartphone with such dimensions.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Mistletoe 2y agoHow long do we have on the 13 mini before it becomes so slow I have to get a new phone? I don’t know what I’ll do at that point. On the 12 mini now and can never go to a big phone.
- SllX 2y agoProbably a couple of more years provided you can keep replacing your battery. I’m on a 13 Pro Max which has the same SoC as a 13 Mini and while I might want a battery replacement within the next year, the phone itself has no performance issues. I think the iPhone 12 model line is essentially in the same boat, just a little bit older and with worse batteries.
- thejsa 2y agoThe battery was the main reason I moved from my 12 mini to a 15 (save for USB-C) — just wasn’t holding up, even after a replacement. I still hold out for a 17 mini, though.
- zie 2y agoA few years still. The XR is still supported with iOS 18.
- sdo72 2y agoMy 3 years old iPhone mini 13 is still very fast, reliable, and I love every part of the phone. It's such an amazing phone that functions well. The only thing got worsened is the battery, now at 87% even though I always charge it to 80-85%, now I have to charge it to 100% to use through the day. I still have extra power (like 30%) for a whole day. Replacing the battery isn't a problem. If Apple does support it like other models, it should last another 4-5 years more. I have no plan to upgrade to anything as I don't see anything comparable on the horizon.
- robin_reala 2y agoNothing wrong with continuing to use the iPhone 13 Mini today: Apple CPU has been so far ahead of the competition that apart from on-device generative AI there’s nothing that hugely pushes it. For data, search for “single-core” and “multi-core” in https://infrequently.org/2024/01/performance-inequality-gap-2024/ https://infrequently.org/2024/01/performance-inequality-gap-...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- roughly 2y agoThe typical iPhone Mini product cycle: Make iPhone Mini -> Mini only accounts for 10% of sales -> Cancel iPhone Mini -> Notice that 10% of iPhone customers haven't updated for 3 or 4 cycles -> Make iPhone Mini -> Suffer crippling corporate amnesia -> <...> I'm expecting the brain worms to reach step 4 of the corporate consciousness cycle around the next generation or so.
- saagarjha 2y agoOne can hope.
- giancarlostoro 2y agoI wonder if that was their attempt to make the iPhone SE have a legitimate place with the other iPhones? Not sure, but it is interesting that no matter what, they always sell the SE.
- pazimzadeh 2y agoonly the 12 and 13 had mini sizes, so not really. unless you are counting the SE1 as mini
- samatman 2y agoDimensions: SE1: 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 Mini 13: 131.5 x 64.2 x 7.65 Counting the original SE as a mini is perfectly reasonable. It's also quite clearly what the grandparent comment was referring to.
- pazimzadeh 2y agoIn that case the first six years of iPhone models were also minis. None were cancelled due to low sales. The original SE was also not cancelled due to low sales, it continued to sell extremely well for years after its release. Apart from the 12/13 minis, the only model that had low sales was the 5C, which is actually a little larger than the 5S. The rule for the SE is that it always has the design of second most recent hardware design, regardless of size. If Apple re-introduces a mini, that will be the first such 'cycle.'