2 ms·
My speculation: there's no real market need. Devices that don't have enough space for the RJ45 are probably using WiFi anyway and have no burning need for a phy
by JohnFen 2y ago
My speculation: there's no real market need. Devices that don't have enough space for the RJ45 are probably using WiFi anyway and have no burning need for a physical ethernet connection.
Since making the connectors smaller also makes them less robust, why take on that tradeoff in the absence of a clear benefit?
I understand that R-Pis and the like appear to be an exception, but they don't represent the amount of marketshare required to spur the sort of industry movement needed to develop Yet Another Standard.
- linuxlizard 2y agoThat does make sense. Ethernet is easily replace by WiFi. There's no easy replacement for USB (can't charge a phone over Bluetooth (yet)).
- stephenr 2y agoInductive charging is the replacement for usb charging. I literally don't remember the last time I charged my iPhone by plugging it in - there are even inductive power banks available now.