2 ms·
One of the biggest problems with superconducting QCs is qubit connectivity. Ideally you want to be able to have all-to-all connectivity, because you want to app
by freetonik 2y ago
One of the biggest problems with superconducting QCs is qubit connectivity. Ideally you want to be able to have all-to-all connectivity, because you want to apply multi-qubit gates on any subset of qubits. With superconducting QCs, qubits are literally connected physically with (kind of) wires. Each connector is another qubit-like component which is driven by classical analog instrument, which again requires a wire going into the chip. It's basically impossible in practice to build a fully connected 100 qubit chip today, for example.
I don't know a lot about photonic QCs, but it at least "solves" this issue: you can apply a signal on multiple qubits at once and you don't need to build a physical connection between them. You also don't need near absolute zero temperatures.
EDIT: sorry, I was thinking of trapped-ion QCs, not photonic!
The company I work at is developing (among other things) chips with a so-called computational resonator[1]: think of a long "bus" to which multiple qubits are connected. As a result, you essentially get all-to-all connectivity with intermediate state moves.
1. https://www.iqmacademy.com/learn/deneb/01-move/ https://www.iqmacademy.com/learn/deneb/01-move/
- IWeldMelons 2y agoWhat if Penrose is right? Then QC could be very well reachable.
- freetonik 2y agoAre you referring to his idea of quantum consciousness?