3 ms·

What's the background on https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-aR5Kiv6yGJ8/T_AgxfYEw_I/AAAAAAABKMM/32LqpvZrqY8/s682/aLGOQ.jpg https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-aR

• TazeTSchnitzel 14y ago
  We've had smartphones as we know them for longer than people seem to acknowledge. Apple just made a slick UI and went with a capacitive touch-screen.
  • raganesh 14y ago
    That is over-simplification of facts. If that were true, why doesn't Samsung leverage the device shown in the comparison to counter-sue Apple? Edit: Trying to understand the down votes. Would like to hear counter-arguments.
    • TazeTSchnitzel 14y ago
      Because they aren't copies, they simply have similar designs. By your logic, I suppose Microsoft could sue Apple since Windows Mobile had an applications list.
      • raganesh 14y ago
        Exactly. They aren't copies. But MS suing Apple - I don't think my logic has any such implication or connotation. As pointed out in Nilay Patel's article, TouchWiz is an attempt to mimic iPhone look & feel. If Samsung had evolved their original design, which you had pointed out was not a copy, then it is a different story.
• berberich 14y ago
  Nilay Patel at The Verge had a good post[1] about this when it first came up in April 2011. Besides the fact that the F700 was announced at MWC in February 2007 (after the iPhone was announced in January), There are huge differences in the interfaces that matter in trade dress and trademark cases. Basically, you wouldn't confuse an iPhone with an F700, while Samsung seemed to design Touch Wiz specifically to do that. [1]: http://www.theverge.com/2011/04/20/talk-picture-samsung-f700/ http://www.theverge.com/2011/04/20/talk-picture-samsung-f700...