3 ms·
I've never tried Siri or S Voice so I can't say anything about the quality of the services or the overall experience but judging by what I saw in the video it d
by lmichelbacher 14y ago
I've never tried Siri or S Voice so I can't say anything about the quality of the services or the overall experience but judging by what I saw in the video it didn't seem to me like it was "a complete blowout for Siri."
The main metric in the comparison seemed to be speed, at which S Voice was a little bit better than Siri. Also, voice quality was slightly in favor of S Voice.
The main differences were S Voice offering image results right away instead of asking to open the browser. On the other hand, S Voice required non-voice input to to specify the remineder time whereas Siri carried on "the conversation". Other than that, the two products pretty much behaved exactly the same. Ask something, get a result.
If you ask me, it was more of a 55:45 for S voice based on speed and naturalness of voice but then I don't run a gadget blog...
- shangaslammi 14y agoThe video isn't comparing Siri to S Voice (which is Samsung's mediocre Siri-clone), but to Google Voice Search in Android 4.1.
- mtgx 14y agoWatch the video again. That's not Samsung's S-Voice. It's Google's new Voice Search. And he's saying it's a lot better than Siri (as other sites and tests have shown, too). He only mentioned S-Voice because he tested S-voice and Siri in another video (not this one), and in that one Siri beats Samsung's S-voice (powered by Vlingo).
- lmichelbacher 14y agoOK, it Google's new Voice Search and not S-Voice. I still think that you can't say that it is vastly superior to Siri based on this video.