3 ms·
This is nonsense. Even when all products are allowed on the market we generally do not get the features we desire. Its the paradox of choice, and how it makes
by ralfn 14y ago
This is nonsense. Even when all products are allowed on the market we generally do not get the features we desire.
Its the paradox of choice, and how it makes people unhappy. If a shop sells peanut butter that is chunky, but also another brand that is extra spicy. Suddenly, we can imagine a peanut butter that is both chunky and spicy.
So, the choice already feels limited with both products on the market and is now even more limited, when their feature set may not overlap.
And as for the suggestion that these patents are the result of R&D. They are not. Not like some of the frand patents actually are.
Originally, the patent system was invented to encourage sharing secrets. But if you cant keep it a secret, because its just too obvious, you shouldnt be able to get a patent. Patents are now mostly used in an anti competitive sense.
The patent system, at least in these days, is counter productive. And the US will in time eat itself up. Because from China to Europe, we dont care about these ip laws to the same extent, and dont really serve our interests.
- simonbrown 14y agoEurope doesn't care about IP laws to the same extent as the US?
- ralfn 14y agoWell, not all of Europe. It really depends on how much IP they have. So, holland, my country, is likely in favor of IP because with our current portfolio, the export of IP minus the import, is profitable. This is not the case for any eastern european country, nor for some of the more traditional economies in western europe. So beyond morality, for many countries, IP law just means opting in to pay other countries. And unlike traditional goods, you cant block the export or import of IP. You can only hope to compromize on some kind of compensation.