3 ms·
Your anecdote corroborates one of the key points in the article: > For instance, a 2021 systemic review of 77 studies that included data on a total of 15,518 t
by bsimpson 2y ago
Your anecdote corroborates one of the key points in the article:
> For instance, a 2021 systemic review of 77 studies that included data on a total of 15,518 tooth sites or surfaces found that using X-rays to detect early tooth decay led to a high degree of false-negative results. In other words, it led to missed cases.
The article isn't just saying you're getting unnecessary radiation. It's also saying that relying on x-rays lets dentists be lazy about finding problems while also billing you for unnecessary work.
- Ferret7446 2y agoDoes it catch cases though? If so, it doesn't mean it isn't worth it just because it misses cases. Also, this may be a good application for AI. I would assume this is an issue with dentists being able to read X-rays carefully and not that the X-rays are unable to capture the signs.