4 ms·
Hmm, I think we have different definitions of a semantic line wrap. To me, semantic line breaks means that line breaks are used to separate clauses and sentence
by MrJohz 2y ago
Hmm, I think we have different definitions of a semantic line wrap. To me, semantic line breaks means that line breaks are used to separate clauses and sentences, such that at least every sentence is on its own line, and every line break represents a semantic clause or sentence gap.
To you, I get the impression that semantic wraps are about ensuring that every wrap/line break happens at a semantically valid place, where semantically valid could be a semantically valid clause, but also a semantically valid intra-word line break.
In that sense, I can see how your strategy would produce the same effects as hard wrapping, albeit with different choices about where to put the wraps. But I think then, like I said, you end up running into the same difficulties that you do with conventional hard wrapping, at least in pathological cases.
- a1369209993 2y ago> such that at least every sentence is on its own line Yes, with the obvious possible exception of trivial/degenerate cases like "i++; j--;" in C or "This is a cat. That is a dog." in English. > and every line break represents a semantic clause or sentence gap. Specifically, it represents a maximally coarse semantic gap, drilling as shallowly down into subclauses as possible/practical. > wrap/line break [can happen at ...] also a semantically valid intra-word line break. Preferably only if that word would already be alone on its overly-long line. Eg: # bad, breaks subordinate clause before superordinate That sounds supercalifragilistic- expialidocious. # semantically valid, but ugly (a pathological case) That sounds supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. # vertically larger, but probably fine # (unless you're feeling incunabulum-y[0]) That sounds supercalifragilistic- expialidocious. > you end up running into the same difficulties that you do with conventional hard wrapping, at least in pathological cases. I've yet to see any evidence that really pathological cases exist. (As opposed to "I'm lazy and can't be arsed" cases, which I'm fairly explicitly not disputing.) 0: http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Incunabulum http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Incunabulum