3 ms·
Your original claim "I've not checked but this guy, and by extension the C++ standards committee who worked on this new API, are probably full of shit" was pret
by nmeofthestate 2y ago
Your original claim "I've not checked but this guy, and by extension the C++ standards committee who worked on this new API, are probably full of shit" was pretty extraordinary.
- userbinator 2y agoLook at the compiler-generated instructions yourself if you don't believe the source that I linked; in the cases I've seen all the extra new stuff just adds another layer on top of existing functions and if the former are faster the latter must necessarily also be. The standards committee's purpose is to justify their own existence by coming up with new stuff all the time. Of course they're going to try to spin it as better in some way.