3 ms·
My point is about this: > No competent dev will accept their skills atrophying due to overly rigid political/tech choices. Competent dev to me is one that del
by hu3 2y ago
My point is about this:
> No competent dev will accept their skills atrophying due to overly rigid political/tech choices.
Competent dev to me is one that delivers value. I say that as a dev but I'm pretty sure stakeholders would agree.
It's perfectly reasonable to hone your skills outside of paying hours if you chose to expand to new technology outside of your employer's stack.
- mellosouls 2y agoFairer, but that's probably the point and tone you should have quoted with then. ;) I would probably concede that it depends on context - for devs paid at the top of the market to simply churn stuff out factory-style there is less justification for self-improvement on work time. For the majority though there is always give and take between responsible employees and employers, and building skills as discussed is normal.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- whatshisface 2y agoYou're not likely to be paid top of the market at a firm whose biggest concern is that you might be more flexible and a faster learner than anyone else they were able to hire.