4 ms·

US Government UAP Footage

• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• ljf 2y ago
  Interesting Gimble is in there - much of what is 'interesting' about this video has been debunked by Mick West: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_West https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_West https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8
  • chamsom 2y ago
    "Debunk" lacks scientific significance as the object remains anomalous and unidentified. It infers that this footage is of a "known" object, and any further intellectual inquiry should be suspended. I think this paper is far more useful to discuss: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.08773.pdf https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.08773.pdf
    • ljf 2y ago
      Debunk Just means to show an assertation as false or expose to ridicule. The idea that the movement is not linked to the movement of the gimbal is shown as incorrect. It is still unidentified, but as I said, much of what is 'interesting' about the video no longer a mystery.
• neom 2y ago
  Nothing new in there, I always keep an eye on this as it gets updated as the source no matter where the mill is publishing the content generally: https://www.dvidshub.net/tags/video/uap?view=list&sort=publishdate https://www.dvidshub.net/tags/video/uap?view=list&sort=publi...