3 ms·
I have a bias towards etymology. Here's the entry for the root τέχνη: https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CF%84%CE%AD%CF%87%CE%BD%CE%B7#Ancient_Greek https://en.
by HPsquared 2y ago
I have a bias towards etymology. Here's the entry for the root τέχνη:
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CF%84%CE%AD%CF%87%CE%BD%CE%B7#Ancient_Greek https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CF%84%CE%AD%CF%87%CE%BD%CE...
That word is all about human (or other) intelligence and skill. Natural things developed and grew by natural processes, not clever skilful design. It's a different animal.
It's the difference between art and science. Technology is a form of art. Patents use the term "prior art" for a reason.
- MichaelZuo 2y agoAre beaver dams not natural then? But technology?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- HPsquared 2y agoI guess they are beaver technology. Non-human intelligence. It's a philosophical question. Regardless it's not the same kind of "mindless brute force evolution" that led to ATP synthase.