2 ms·
That is a question of whether they're allowed to hire people, not whether they can afford to.
by thaumasiotes 2y ago
That is a question of whether they're allowed to hire people, not whether they can afford to.
- Jtsummers 2y agoThen why did you write: > if they can afford to pay Anduril to hire those people, they can more easily afford to hire the same people themselves. They can't afford to hire the same people because they can't (as in, they legally cannot) pay the salaries those people are going to demand. That's what I was responding to. The gov't cannot afford to hire the same people themselves, they can hire other people at lower salaries but not the same people.
- thaumasiotes 2y agoBecause that's obvious? Hiring someone is always cheaper than hiring someone else to hire the original person. You can't transform something into an affordability problem by wishing. Do you think giving the government more money would solve their hiring problem? No? Then their hiring problem isn't related to what they can afford.