> Why intentionally introduce potential bugs for the sake of making a point? It seems spiteful, but it strikes me as an interesting illustration of how the rob

> Why intentionally introduce potential bugs for the sake of making a point? It seems spiteful, but it strikes me as an interesting illustration of how the robustness principle could be hacked to force change. It’s a descriptivist versus prescriptivist view of standards, which is not how we typically view standards.