3 ms·

Look here and see how everyone contribute: https://wordpress.org/five-for-the-future/pledges/?order=hours https://wordpress.org/five-for-the-future/pledges/?ord

by shprd 2y ago

Look here and see how everyone contribute: https://wordpress.org/five-for-the-future/pledges/?order=hours https://wordpress.org/five-for-the-future/pledges/?order=hou... >shake down WPEngine for money into his own pocket It's not going to Matt pocket, Matt pays that multiple folds and has done that for years. Stop making ignorant accusations.

ImPostingOnHN 2y ago
> It's not going to Matt pocket Yes, it is. He demanded WPEngine pay 8% of revenues to Automattic. Not to the community. To Automattic: matt's private, for-profit corporation. The one matt runs along with a private equity friend of his. The one matt likely owns much of, too. The one matt named after himself. Also, please stop ignoring the questions posed to you: Should matt have such a veto power over what the community wants? Put another way, the community has tolerated matt's behavior, but he keeps digging more and more – how do we stop his bad behavior? And back to the first question: "tolerated" by who? The community embraced WPEngine and their contributions to the community. It's matt that the community can't tolerate.
- shprd 2y ago
  I answered what I can but here let me put your mind at rest: > Should matt have such a veto power over what the community wants? Put another way, the community has tolerated matt's behavior, but he keeps digging more and more – how do we stop his bad behavior? Am I sitting on some regulatory board? What this got to do with me? if I had to propose anything it'd be form a board from all major contributors to solve this conflict and reach a resolution > "tolerated" by who? The community embraced WPEngine and their contributions to the community. It's matt that the community can't tolerate. No, Matt supported and invested in them for years, before you and "the community" even heard about them. He was the one there from the very beginning.
  - ImPostingOnHN 2y ago
    > Am I sitting on some regulatory board? What this got to do with me Well, I asked a simple question: Should matt have such a veto power over what the community wants? What do you think? Should he? > if I had to propose anything it'd be form a board from all major contributors to solve this conflict Ignoring for a moment that matt is banning contributors, rather than caring what they want: What about what the wordpress community wants? They are the most important and most numerous stakeholders here. > No, Matt not only embraced them, he supported and invested in them for years, before you and "the community" even heard about them. He was the one there from the very beginning. No, the community has embraced WPEngine and their contributions to the community and to Automattic's success. So who specifically are you speaking of, who merely "tolerated" WPEngine?

by shprd 2y ago

ImPostingOnHN 2y ago

> It's not going to Matt pocket Yes, it is. He demanded WPEngine pay 8% of revenues to Automattic. Not to the community. To Automattic: matt's private, for-profit corporation. The one matt runs along with a private equity friend of his. The one matt likely owns much of, too. The one matt named after himself. Also, please stop ignoring the questions posed to you: Should matt have such a veto power over what the community wants? Put another way, the community has tolerated matt's behavior, but he keeps digging more and more – how do we stop his bad behavior? And back to the first question: "tolerated" by who? The community embraced WPEngine and their contributions to the community. It's matt that the community can't tolerate.

shprd 2y ago
I answered what I can but here let me put your mind at rest: > Should matt have such a veto power over what the community wants? Put another way, the community has tolerated matt's behavior, but he keeps digging more and more – how do we stop his bad behavior? Am I sitting on some regulatory board? What this got to do with me? if I had to propose anything it'd be form a board from all major contributors to solve this conflict and reach a resolution > "tolerated" by who? The community embraced WPEngine and their contributions to the community. It's matt that the community can't tolerate. No, Matt supported and invested in them for years, before you and "the community" even heard about them. He was the one there from the very beginning.
- ImPostingOnHN 2y ago
  > Am I sitting on some regulatory board? What this got to do with me Well, I asked a simple question: Should matt have such a veto power over what the community wants? What do you think? Should he? > if I had to propose anything it'd be form a board from all major contributors to solve this conflict Ignoring for a moment that matt is banning contributors, rather than caring what they want: What about what the wordpress community wants? They are the most important and most numerous stakeholders here. > No, Matt not only embraced them, he supported and invested in them for years, before you and "the community" even heard about them. He was the one there from the very beginning. No, the community has embraced WPEngine and their contributions to the community and to Automattic's success. So who specifically are you speaking of, who merely "tolerated" WPEngine?