3 ms·
These contradictions (?) may be rooted in the reader’s assumptions about the world: the writer says A and B, but to the reader B implies (not A) because of thei
by keybored 2y ago
These contradictions (?) may be rooted in the reader’s assumptions about the world: the writer says A and B, but to the reader B implies (not A) because of their world view. In short they might not be actual contradictions.
This might seem very vague but a discussion on something so first-person as the mind is ripe for that kind of thing.
Which is resolved with dialogue. If the contradictions are brought up.
- mistermann 2y ago> Which is resolved with dialogue. If the contradictions are brought up. In my experience noting contradictions usually leads to evasive memes and anger/unhappiness.
- keybored 2y agoThen mum’s the word.
- mistermann 2y agoCutting off access to an entire region of potential upward utility...perhaps permanently if no one is willing to fight the consensus.
- keybored 2y agoI don’t understand what you are saying.
- mistermann 2y agoContradiction is socially disruptive, and ignored/policed quite thoroughly, denying access to Humans of pretty substantial portions of reality which is instead represented by illusory proxies/heuristics.
- keybored 2y agoYou’re talking in riddles even more than the most hermit mindfulness practitioner.
- mistermann 2y agoAn example: if religion shut down early practitioners of science, do you believe humanity would have missed out on any valuable knowledge? Or, how about if science had only received 1% of the total funding it has?