Yeah, this is wildly optimistic. From personal experience, I'm skeptical of the quantity and especially quality of published documentation available, the compl

Yeah, this is wildly optimistic. From personal experience, I'm skeptical of the quantity and especially quality of published documentation available, the completeness of that documentation, the degree to which it both recognizes and covers all the relevant edge cases, etc. Even Apple, which used to be quite good at that kind of thing, has increasingly effectively referred developers to their WWDC videos. I'm also skeptical of the ability of the LLMs to ingest and properly synthesize that documentation - I'm willing to bet the answers from SO and Reddit are doing more heavy lifting on shaping the LLM's "answers" than you're hoping here. There is nothing in my couple decades of programming or experience with LLMs that suggests to me that published documentation is going to be sufficient to let an LLM produce sufficient quality output without human synthesis somehwere in the loop.