2 ms·
They did pull the bottom of the previous booster out. On the webcast they mentioned adjusting the landing maneuver for the ship to be a bit softer in case they
by dotnet00 2y ago
They did pull the bottom of the previous booster out. On the webcast they mentioned adjusting the landing maneuver for the ship to be a bit softer in case they decide to recover it too.
- Klathmon 2y agoThe previous booster landed in the golf of Mexico. This starship landed in the Indian ocean a bit west of Australia, it's like 3x deeper.
- eqvinox 2y ago↑ That. For extra context: that "3× deeper" makes costs seriously explode. People do know how to engineer for that depth, but it's a lot of effort and there's pretty much no commercial market. For shallower stuff there's oil rigs, deep-sea cables, seafloor mining, even just tourism… but at some point it just peters out and only research vessels tackle the depth. (source: friend of mine works at a UK university doing deep-sea vehicles)
- RaoulP 2y ago>(source: friend of mine works at a UK university doing deep-sea vehicles) As in he works on their development? That sounds exciting, do you have something like the name of one of the vehicles?
- eqvinox 2y ago> As in he works on their development? Yes, she works on their development. > That sounds exciting, do you have something like the name of one of the vehicles? No vehicle name, but this is the university department/lab: https://www.southampton.ac.uk/research/facilities/maritime-robotics-instrumentation-laboratory https://www.southampton.ac.uk/research/facilities/maritime-r... (Their vehicles don't even go that deep, but again that was the point I was trying to make… even in research, the very deep stuff is rare and a "big project" that ends up fanned out ⇒ MRIL made only the cameras for a 4km vessel…)