I am sorry, but I hate Hugo. My go-to meme has been "The most difficult we do at this place is formatting documentation". I can go 10 iterations just to get a

I am sorry, but I hate Hugo. My go-to meme has been "The most difficult we do at this place is formatting documentation". I can go 10 iterations just to get an image link or internal reference right. And the fact that I would like my .md files to look at least ok in github as well as Hugo makes me scratch my head. If I want an inline image I use two references. One for github and one for Hugo, where one reference is broken in the other. Looks ugly but at least it works. Not to mention panels. The mix between Hugo's markup and markdown markup. The chosen markup dialect. Errors because of missing Hugo headers. And there is no regression testing. It can take 2 years for one of my product managers to notice that the link is broken. When she most needed it. Yes, I am probably holding it wrong. Please make me feel good.