3 ms·
the Rolfes? It's pretty clear to me (by triangulating his other written output) that 1984 was based on the notion that if cheap rifles produced Liberté, égalit
by 082349872349872 2y ago
the Rolfes?
It's pretty clear to me (by triangulating his other written output) that 1984 was based on the notion that if cheap rifles produced Liberté, égalité, fraternité, then nuclear triads would produce oligarchies.
If the drones are going to be doing all the fighting now, I sure hope they eventually get the vote? [I'm still curious what the arabic in "Malak" (2010) says]
I eventually figured (even if not syntactically obvious, eg 02014) that 2014 was 5774/1435; thought my excursion into Social Choice Theory had ACK'ed? — or had I picked the wrong rabbit warren?
- gradschoolfail 2y agoMalak (according to the most eric schmidtian translator: 1: whats the reality of this? 2: And for your onions The various factions should coalesce into voting blocs, similar to the EC: Uk fr us > 0 Cn pk> 1 Ru in > 2 Il > 3 For extra fun mix n match, eg pk+in, us+cn ru+uk, il+fr etc Drones: no way current solar tech will allow attack drones that feed like birds on seed of sun. Thus limited is the duality of that tech.. stopgap is beaming tech agreed; wide collector not required (precision targeting of transmitting lasers/masers already quite mature?) Sustainable pathways towards birdlike but nonicarean tech require parallel construction of contingencies like faraday motors/supercaps etc