yeah. Me, for one. WordPress is kinda awful in a lot of ways. BUT You can hand a thoughtfully build WP site over to a non technical client, and they can work

yeah. Me, for one. WordPress is kinda awful in a lot of ways. BUT You can hand a thoughtfully build WP site over to a non technical client, and they can work out or learn how to do 90% of the publishing and updating they need to do, or easily find staff or contractors with lots of WordPress experience to do it for them. The "43% of the entire web" statistic is a really really good reason to recommend WP for that reason. There is obviously not a single competing CMS/blog-platform that has anything like as many experiences users. Where by "users" I mean people who are familiar with or even experts on publishing content using it. That's the real "WordPress Community", the people using it on a day to day basis to get their jobs/hobbies/responsibilities done. That's the "WordPress Community" that makes it "the right thing" for agencies and contractors and IT departments to recommend WordPress. Up until 2 weeks ago, I regularly recommended WordPress. In spite of it's flaws.