3 ms·
Volcanoes give you a lot of warning and most in Washington are not located close to major population centers. The one exception is Mount Rainier, which is on th
by jandrewrogers 2y ago
Volcanoes give you a lot of warning and most in Washington are not located close to major population centers. The one exception is Mount Rainier, which is on the Decade Volcano list. Technically Glacier Peak is a similar distance from Seattle but it is a much smaller volcano and risk of damage is much lower. Historically the Cascade volcanoes only erupt something like 2-3 times per century and most are minor. It isn’t something anyone really worries about. Much higher risk from earthquakes.
I lived down range of Mount St. Helens when it had its major eruption in 1980. It was a regional disaster but the recovery was relatively quick and few people died despite the epic scale of it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade_Volcanoes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade_Volcanoes
- loeg 2y agoThe suburbs southeast of Seattle are maybe at risk of lahar flows. The city itself and suburbs to the north are mostly not at risk.
- Schiendelman 2y agoIt's a stretch to even say suburbs - more exurbs and some completely separate cities.
- loeg 2y agoSure. In the most extreme scenario I think there is flooding and debris coming up the Duwamish towards South Park and Georgetown.
- Schiendelman 2y agoWow. I sit corrected - I had no idea it could impact so far north, but I see maps show flooding there potentially! Thanks for teaching me something new.