5 ms·

Have you read the GPL?

• DonnieBurger 2y ago
  Parent does not mention GPL, nor is this a GPL issue. It's about the takeover of an existing plugin and it's reviews/installs.
  • ankleturtle 2y ago
    I am not a lawyer, but I am really curious if this would amount to tortious interference.
• Sebguer 2y ago
  Eventually you are going to have to confront that the distance between 'technical correctness' and 'moral correctness' is vaster than you apparently think it is.
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• curiousgal 2y ago
  [flagged]
• kristofferR 2y ago
  What kind of response is that? Does that mean you approve of sites like GPLDL then?
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• rpgbr 2y ago
  The problem isn’t GPL or code, it’s a trademark and trusting issue.
• chx 2y ago
  Have you read https://trademarks.justia.com/983/21/advanced-custom-98321164.html https://trademarks.justia.com/983/21/advanced-custom-9832116... and https://trademarks.justia.com/983/21/acf-98321135.html https://trademarks.justia.com/983/21/acf-98321135.html ?
  • s1ds 2y ago
    Have you read them? Both are in pending status and not registered. "Advanced Custom Fields" most recent update before a last minute extension to respond to final notice was for: "Merely Descriptive Refusal - Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes the function of applicant’s goods and/or services." So far even USPTO attorneys think it's a generic mark not worthy of being registered: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn98321164&docId=NFIN20240719151315&linkId=2#docIndex=1&page=1 https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn98321164&docI...