3 ms·
"Got a bit of the nastiness going there" Ever seen Idiocracy? Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's not. "If your users cannot figure out what you are trying t
by wissler 14y ago
"Got a bit of the nastiness going there"
Ever seen Idiocracy? Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's not.
"If your users cannot figure out what you are trying to accomplish then yes, I believe you have failed"
Your standards are idiotic. The phrase "your users" is hopelessly vague. Which users? G+ has millions. Should it pander to each and every one or only the most idiotic of users? What if by making it easier to understand for the lowest common denominator, it makes the intelligent users go away? Your idiotic standards don't address this.
Call me nasty if you want; I am simply citing the facts.
- protomyth 14y agoI don't really see you citing any facts, just a lot of opinion. I guess saying G+ has millions of users is a fact with a rather large caveat. Google makes it very hard to avoid a G+ membership if you want to use other Google services. Elitism does not define greatness and simple does not mean idiotic. The iPod was successful because it was simple in usage, but it was not idiotic.
- wissler 14y ago"I don't really see you citing any facts, just a lot of opinion." In your opinion. In my opinion, you're failing to address the argument I gave.