3 ms·
> The honest answer is they have a lot of ICBMs. That is not the honest answer. Also, the response to the threat of ICBMs is well known, it's called mutually a
by consumer451 2y ago
> The honest answer is they have a lot of ICBMs.
That is not the honest answer. Also, the response to the threat of ICBMs is well known, it's called mutually assured destruction.
The honest answer is that it would lead to sanctions on countries who continue to do business with russia. These are countries who we could like to consider as allies, such as India.
- mattmaroon 2y agoNot really. Why would it? Those same allies trade with other nations we’ve designated as terrorists. And we’ve already pulled basically every sanction lever against Russia anyway. At this point we’ve probably sanctioned them more than anyone we call a terrorist state. The difference is nukes.
- consumer451 2y agoI respect your opinion, even though I disagree. FYI, the website in your bio is down.
- mattmaroon 2y agoHa I think I joined here in 2007. It worked back then.
- consumer451 2y agoThe only reason that I found this is that I recently made a Firefox extension that shows a tooltip with the user's bio, when hovering over a username on this site. I am not sure what to name it, HN Inappropriate Snoop?