3 ms·
That happened to Spike Lee, with his "Malcolm X" movie. The big problem was length. The completion bond company pulled the plug at one point. Lee found enough r
by Animats 2y ago
That happened to Spike Lee, with his "Malcolm X" movie. The big problem was length. The completion bond company pulled the plug at one point. Lee found enough rich black people to bail out the production, and eventually released the 202 minute version. It was a critical success, but just too long to make money in theaters.
With the notable exception of "Gone with the Wind", few Hollywood films over 3 hours made money.[1]
This is less of a problem today, because there are alternatives to theatrical distribution. Long-form mini-series are a thing, and home screens are good enough for epic movies.
IMdb says of Megalopolis, "It's 138 minutes long, but feels like it exceeds the three hour mark." The worst of both worlds.
[1] https://www.digitaltrends.com/movies/the-longest-hollywood-movies-ever-ranked/ https://www.digitaltrends.com/movies/the-longest-hollywood-m...
- mrbombastic 2y agoTitanic another notable exception, but to be honest I don’t really believe this as a rule and think it has more to do with pacing then runtime. There are long films that don’t feel like they are dragging and short films that do.
- woleium 2y agoJFK was 3:20ish and made 200mm in its first run (international)