3 ms·
> "check your phone at the door" policies No, no, no. A device in a (near-)stranger’s unsupervised physical possession for hours is a compromised device. No.
by mananaysiempre 2y ago
> "check your phone at the door" policies
No, no, no. A device in a (near-)stranger’s unsupervised physical possession for hours is a compromised device. No.
- consteval 2y agoOkay so leave it in your locked car...
- kelnos 2y agoConceptually I like the idea of giving everyone a locking pouch to put the phone in, with the ability to unlock it provided at the end of the event. That way the phone never leaves your person, but is unusable. But at the same time this sort of thing would also make me kinda annoyed (as I have no problem, generally, keeping my phone in my pocket, on silent, when having it out is inappropriate0.
- tylergetsay 2y agoNot really, a phone in first boot not unlocked state is secure against most threat models
- fnfjfk 2y agoIs your threat model really that people whose wedding you're attending are trying to exploit your phone..?
- ruthmarx 2y agoNot really, not if you secure your phone adequately, which these days is easier than ever. It's unlikely there will be state actors at this wedding or whatever ready to open up your phone and swap out a chip.