3 ms·
The only relevant study linked in the article is https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(24)00115-7/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/j
by stevebmark 2y ago
The only relevant study linked in the article is https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(24)00115-7/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7...
> Plant-sourced UPF contribution showed a positive association [with CVD risk]
The study is using an existing dataset on food recall. That doesn't necessarily the results are correct or incorrect, but it's lower on the pyramid of science quality. There is nothing else of substance in this BBC article.
- bsdz 2y agoI put the article through an SEO external link extractor and I saw many more external links to various studies from various organisations. Why are the other studies irrelevant?
- pessimizer 2y agoAre you going to be specific, or make the person you're replying to do all of the work? They told you what they thought was relevant. If you've reviewed one of the others and found it relevant, say which and why, and ask why they disagree.
- bsdz 2y agoThe person I replied to had apparently already done that work. That's why I asked the question. I haven't made any judgements on which studies were relevant / irrelevant.