> Indeed. Source code is speech, and speech cannot infringe patents. (Not saying this is logical, that's just what the case law says.) Are you sure about this?

> Indeed. Source code is speech, and speech cannot infringe patents. (Not saying this is logical, that's just what the case law says.) Are you sure about this? So I could write any patent-infringing code I want, distribute source-only (or even write it in a purely interpreted language) and then nobody can complain that I've violated any of their patents?