3 ms·
This dude has issues, the reddit post in /r/MachineLearning top comment: > Yes, basically. Delete any kyegomez link on sight. He namesquats recent papers for t
by thawab 2y ago
This dude has issues, the reddit post in /r/MachineLearning top comment:
> Yes, basically. Delete any kyegomez link on sight. He namesquats recent papers for the clout, though the code never actually runs, much less replicates the paper results. We've had problems in /r/mlscaling with people unwittingly linking his garbage - we haven't bothered to set up an Automod rule, though.
[0] https://github.com/princeton-nlp/tree-of-thought-llm/issues/17 https://github.com/princeton-nlp/tree-of-thought-llm/issues/...
[1] https://x.com/ShunyuYao12/status/1663946702754021383 https://x.com/ShunyuYao12/status/1663946702754021383
- Quizzical4230 2y agoOh! What really bothers me is that this kyegomez person wasted time and energy of so many people and for what?
- thawab 2y agofollowers, clicks? anyone who spends a few minutes browsing his repo will know he is a fraud. Here is an example: https://github.com/kyegomez/AlphaFold3 https://github.com/kyegomez/AlphaFold3 most issues are people not able to run his code. These issues are closed. The repo has 700 stars.
- Quizzical4230 2y agoSaw an issue which fails at `pip install alphafold3`. If you're gonna bamboozle me, at least put in the effort to get the first step right Xp
- az226 2y agoJust gonna leave this here: https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts/issues/78#issuecomment-1672516443 https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts/issues/78#issue... Also this part from the reply before editing it away: They get mad that my repo and code is better than their's and they published they paper, they feel entitled even though I reproduced the entire paper based on 4 phrases, dfs, bfs (search algos), generate solutions, and generate thoughts and this is it. I didn't even read the full paper when I first started to implement it. The reason they want people to unstar my repo is because they are jealous that they made a mistake by not sharing the code when they published the paper as real scientists would do. If you do not publish your code as a AI research scientists you are a heretic, as your work cannot be tried and tested. and the code works amazingly much better than theirs, I looked at their code and couldn't figure out how to run it for hours, as well as other people have reported the same. the motivations are jealously, self hatred, guilt, envy, inferiority complex, ego, and much more psychographic principles.
- Quizzical4230 2y agoI have SO MANY THOUGHTS. But its best to leave them out for sanity :) Thanks for adding the unedited comment as it shines light over the newly fabricated comment.
- newman314 2y agoI looked on his GH profile page. How was he able to amass over 16k GitHub stars?
- thawab 2y agoNew research paper drop or go viral > create a repo with AI code > post it in social media. Users star a repo to bookmark it. The few who test the code write in the issue section and get their issue closed with no replies. Thats why some subreddits flagged these name squatters.
- kevindamm 2y agoI think a lot of people use stars as a kind of bookmark, not for recognition. It takes time to read through the code or set up a working build from a fork. I, for one, occasionally use stars to remind myself to return to a repo for a more thorough look (especially if I'm on mobile at the time). Also, bots.