3 ms·
This is going to depend on the market. If you consider enterprise I'd argue Microsoft are very much still a monopoly. A client of mine is in the process of remo
by zahllos 2y ago
This is going to depend on the market. If you consider enterprise I'd argue Microsoft are very much still a monopoly. A client of mine is in the process of removing their existing telephony solution, which has many more features than teams, for teams, because teams is bundled with the necessary Microsoft 365 to get all the Azure controls needed for regulatory compliance.
- devjab 2y agoMost enterprise organisations killed off their different chat clients and phones and switched to teams in my area of the world. Not necessarily tech companies, but everyone else didn’t want the additional cost when Teams came “for free”.
- simfree 2y agoTeams phone system is a significant additional licensing expense, it's definitely not free. It's also not standards compliant, despite speaking a malformed version of SIP, so you can't just plug it into standard SIP Infrastructure and have it send and receive invites for calls, or send and receive SIP simple messages for texting.
- zahllos 2y agoNot being standards compliant does not surprise me at all. I've never looked at the cost, but I was told switching to teams is being done to save money. So perhaps not as much money as hoped...