My post was intentionally generalized to stay on point. The "wise" know which. Some readers might truly (not disingenuously) not know, but then the argument wou

My post was intentionally generalized to stay on point. The "wise" know which. Some readers might truly (not disingenuously) not know, but then the argument would degenerate into a blind political flamewar - which is the key system in the weaponized trolling arsenal that made this all possible. The only way to have this argument is on general terms - does a foreign adversary have an "effective right" to win elections by subverting the democratic process.