4 ms·

I think it's a little bit of a silly thought to think that just because people want to be slimmer now, they want to do so just as much as they would have facing

• llamaimperative 2y ago
  How big were the health food, gym, and fitness industries in the 50s? Answer: literally non-existent.
  • mlyle 2y ago
    How big were the 'crash diet' and 'smoke cigarettes to stay thin' and 'use amphetamines to stay thin' industries? Indeed, we have the inception of Weight Watchers at the start of the next decade, replacing far crazier things like the cabbage diet being used en masse. Yes, it was easier in some ways to live a healthier life; one reason why was the rampant social policing of each other's weight.
    • llamaimperative 2y ago
      The prevalence of dedicated dieting or weight loss efforts has increased over time. The success of those efforts has decreased over time.
      • mlyle 2y ago
        > The prevalence of dedicated dieting or weight loss efforts has increased over time. Perhaps, perhaps not. But you'd expect that if there's many different causes making weight gain more common and only one is changes in social pressures (as I've already stipulated in each post). And, likewise, as stipulated above: overt social stigma is not the only reason why people might prefer to be of a lower weight. > The success of those efforts has decreased over time. Well, one reason for this is that we've reduced the use of obviously harmful but effective weight loss techniques like cigarettes and stimulants. The 1950s were the era of the rainbow diet pill clinic, where you'd walk in and get a personalized cocktail of amphetamines and thyroid drugs and laxatives and diuretics to help you control weight.