5th Circuit rules ISP should have terminated Internet users accused of piracy "Accused of"? Surely they meant, "Proven guilty of" ?? I ask because there are

5th Circuit rules ISP should have terminated Internet users accused of piracy "Accused of"? Surely they meant, "Proven guilty of" ?? I ask because there are applications that can turn a persons internet connection unknowingly into a proxy or VPN server. It's a shady practice but if all one needs to get terminated is a hit from an IP address then millions of people could get disconnected with little or no recourse, could they not? If this is the case then everyone will need an easy to use UI into an eBPF monitor that records all communications into and out of their system before/after it is encrypted. [1] Not to be confused with a MitM proxy. And everyone would also need to implement something like Little Snitch or OpenSnitch [2] to limit what can talk to the internet and when or one dodgy NPM library could rue the day. [1] - https://github.com/tks98/snoopy https://github.com/tks98/snoopy [2] - https://github.com/evilsocket/opensnitch https://github.com/evilsocket/opensnitch