> "used in production" is not the same as being a serious wordpress alternative. You only said you thought it wasn't ready for prime time, which I think a reas

> "used in production" is not the same as being a serious wordpress alternative. You only said you thought it wasn't ready for prime time, which I think a reasonable interpretation is that you were saying you didn't think it was ready for production use. > Would bet that none of those production deployments are without some non-negligible developer time investment. That's the thing, I think the time invested is pretty negligible. Especially when compared to maintaining wordpress and having to deal with plugin craziness. > Having to code standard CMS functionalities becomes an eye-rolling exercise. You only really have to setup models for pages, tags, categories etc, after that the editor is incredibly functional.