3 ms·
I'm not sure running an additional service plus a SaaS requirement is better than relying on infra. Standing up this service is going to rely on your infra. W
by turtlebits 2y ago
I'm not sure running an additional service plus a SaaS requirement is better than relying on infra. Standing up this service is going to rely on your infra. What if it goes down?
If you're going to have to write a scheduled check-in anyways, why not use something like cronitor and reduce the complexity? (they host the check-in endpoint)
- psnehanshu 2y agoIf the infra goes down, you fix it while alive, otherwise the snooze timeout on the PagerDuty incident will expire and that will trigger the configured tasks. If PagerDuty goes out of business before that, then that's a different discussion.
- adamdecaf 2y agoExactly. At Moov we rely on PD, so if they’re down we have bigger issues anyway. I plan to support additional integrations so a check-in could update multiple
- turtlebits 2y agoMy point was - if you're going to rely on a SaaS (Pagerduty), why not just use one that includes health check monitoring (ie cronitor) and cut out this self hosted webhook service?
- adamdecaf 2y agoDeadcheck handles calculating the snooze durations for you. It could be a library as well.