3 ms·

I mean, that's good right? They aren't getting special treatment over anyone else.

• HideousKojima 2y ago
  A company not giving priority to some of their biggest customers/revenue generators/whatever is a sign that there's deeper rot within that company. See the recent fiasco with Mozilla mishandling the uBlock Origin/Lite dev for another example of this.
  • hackable_sand 2y ago
    The size of a paycheck has zero dictation of priority What dumbbells are out here optimizing for that?
    • HideousKojima 2y ago
      Are you serious? Suppose you're running a company, and you have two clients. One brings you $20,000 in profit a year, the other brings in $600,000 a year. Both of them have some sort of issue they need to resolve and report it to you at almost the exact same time. Let's say the smaller company reports it slightly earlier. But you only have enough manpower to solve the issues one at a time. Whose do you solve first? The incredibly obvious answer to 99% of people is to solve it for the company that brings you 30 times more profit than the other. Any other answer is a sign of severe dysfunction and or insanity in the company.
    • arp242 2y ago
      Every serious business will prioritize a customer that brings in a lot of money over a customer than brings in very little money. You should do right by both, yes, because it's the right thing to do, and small customers turn in to big customers so it also makes business sense. But you don't just leave a big customer hanging for days or weeks, because they might get annoyed with you and go to $competitor which will seriously impact you. No serious business treats their big customers that, and it's a sign of dysfunction if they do.