4 ms·
If the argument is that LLMs are bad at reasoning because they are easily distractible and the results vary with modifications in the question, one should be re
by singularity2001 2y ago
If the argument is that LLMs are bad at reasoning because they are easily distractible and the results vary with modifications in the question, one should be reminded of the consistency and distractability of humans.
- zeroonetwothree 2y agoWhy? LLMs are supposedly better than humans (as many comments claim in this thread).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- riku_iki 2y agoTrained human can tell if distracted: "I am distracted and can't figure out answer", while LLM will confidently gives you wrong answer, which makes whole results not reliable.