2 ms·
That's... what I originally said... "in the know" and "you had to be there" are effectively the same statment It's is exactly why I feel more comfortable with
by dartos 2y ago
That's... what I originally said...
"in the know" and "you had to be there" are effectively the same statment
It's is exactly why I feel more comfortable with complexity creep in Rust as opposed to C++, since I can easily find and read the rationale for just about every feature.
- pjmlp 2y agoNo they aren't, those "in the know" have access to ISO servers, mailing lists, meeting minutes, paper votes, and related content. Some of the public C++ stuff: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21 https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21 Some of the public C stuff: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/ https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/ Some of the public Ada stuff: https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG9/ https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG9/ And so on. Those "in the know" have access to the stuff that is beyond that. However that is already plenty of stuff publicly available at those https://www.open-std.org https://www.open-std.org subsites as well.
- dartos 2y agoI don’t really know what your argument is > Those "in the know" have access to the stuff that is beyond that. Yeah “you have to be there” But these are all great! It’s a shame they’re not as discoverable.