3 ms·
Not to defend Cruise too much, but the 2.5 to 5 miles stat is misleading in that they aren't real time disengagements. They are instances where the vehicle proa
by enragedcacti 2y ago
Not to defend Cruise too much, but the 2.5 to 5 miles stat is misleading in that they aren't real time disengagements. They are instances where the vehicle proactively identified a situation where it wasn't confident enough to proceed and then safely stopped while awaiting a response. This is obviously way too often in terms being a courteous and legal road user but its completely different from a driver taking over as the vehicle attempts an unsafe maneuver.
- fiddlerwoaroof 2y agoIt’s just differently unsafe because it assumes that “safely stopping” is possible which may not be true in every situation.
- porphyra 2y agoDidn't the unfortunate incident where it dragged a pedestrian happen because it tried to "safely pull over" while dragging her?
- enragedcacti 2y agoI don't have any clue if it assumes that, I was just illustrating the difference in failure modes. In either case differently unsafe is not mutually exclusive with being orders of magnitude safer overall which Cruise is compared to current FSD when unsupervised.