3 ms·
Stable solutions to the 3-body problem were known centuries ago...but Phys.org couldn't resist adding "discovered" to their headline. The paper itself merely c
by bell-cot 2y ago
Stable solutions to the 3-body problem were known centuries ago...but Phys.org couldn't resist adding "discovered" to their headline.
The paper itself merely claims to have done a bunch of work to further characterize and statistically analyze 3-body situations.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- spwa4 2y agoA more correct term would be "saddle points". They're stable, until the tiniest of perturbations occurs, then they're not stable anymore.
- bell-cot 2y agoThat is true of some of them - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point#Stability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point#Stability - but famously not others - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_objects_at_Lagrange_points#Sun%E2%80%93Jupiter_Lagrange_points https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_objects_at_Lagrange_po...
- spwa4 2y agoNope, true of all of them. They're massively large and pretty flat, so yes you can be in them for a "long" time. But still saddle points tiny perturbation will kick you out. It'll just take a while to get kicked out due to the shear size of these "points". They "capture" asteroids temporarily.
- gregw2 2y agoYeah. For anyone interested in the history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem For a fun animation of a bunch of solutions, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:5_4_800_36_downscaled.gif https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:5_4_800_36_downscaled.gif