29 ms·
The statements are hyperlinked to sources in the comments. You can read those. What in particular are you disputing?
by forgot-im-old 2y ago
The statements are hyperlinked to sources in the comments. You can read those. What in particular are you disputing?
- nolok 2y agoThe source are talk and wish dreams and nothing more. Elon said a anti missile shield called SHIELD would be cool (nooo, Elon had another random idea from someone who doesn't know the field but has enough pr clout to make it published?), and Elon used to work or at least be in the same building as a general when he visits for a company that do space launch and is critical to US infrastructure needs (noo? you don't say ?) , and someone else said about shield against missile wouldn't be cool (noo?). That's nothing real or factual.
- forgot-im-old 2y agoYou really don't know what you're talking about. That "visiting 4 Star General" now reports full time to Elon, as the WSJ determined via numerous sources.
- nolok 2y agoAnd? Is he still a general while reporting full time to Elon? If yes you have a bigger scandal, active duty general report full time to private interests! If not then it's what happens when high level public official leaves office to go in the private space, of course he works for one of the connection he made. Unless you have proof that despite his leaving office he has an active decisionnary role on public and defense spending, then you're accusing someone juste because they work after leaving their previous job.
- forgot-im-old 2y ago[dead]
- nolok 2y agoI did, my questions stand.