4 ms·
Someone who has a failed startup is in a better position to give advice than someone who has not. You seem quite willing to deem someone not ready or not in a
by delano 18y ago
Someone who has a failed startup is in a better position to give advice than someone who has not.
You seem quite willing to deem someone not ready or not in a position to give advice. Also, before you make a bold claim about someone's character it would be helpful if you read their previous comments.
- calambrac 18y agoWhat are you talking about? When did I say anyone wasn't ready or in a position to give advice, and when did I say anything about anyone's character? Opinions were asked for, I gave mine, someone disagreed with me, and I disagreed with their reasoning. Nobody's feelings should be hurt, grow up.
- nostrademons 18y agoIt didn't really hurt my feelings. We're all (well, mostly) adults here; we can disagree without taking it personally. I just thought it was kind of odd that you'd suggest someone might not have enough risk appetite for a startup, and then when someone else replies that most entrepreneurs take calculated risks, point out that they failed. Failure is a part of risk. All those folks who did take the risk of starting a startup...well, most of them failed. Does that make them unqualified to give startup advice? Kinda contradictory, given your original point.
- calambrac 18y agoI never said you were unqualified to give advice, and I wasn't trying to insult you for your startup's failure (of course failure is a part of risk). My original point was that risk-averse people probably won't have successful startups, and I didn't understand why you would hold up your failed startup up as evidence to the contrary. Here's another bold opinion: if some jackass like me can persuade him not to do a startup by pointing out that startups aren't for the risk-averse, then he probably shouldn't be doing a startup.