3 ms·
ARM sure isn't the future. RISC-V is.
by snvzz 2y ago
ARM sure isn't the future.
RISC-V is.
- deadmutex 2y agoFuture can be 6 days from now or 6 centuries from now. This statement is useless without specific details.
- readthenotes1 2y agoBut by providing such details the statement goes from unknowable to unknown and potentially verifiable at some point. Avoiding falsifiable statements is a skill set that might be worth having in your communications toolkit. (I remember reading that some philosophy school had {True, false, unknown, unknowable} but, alas, cannot find any reference to that just now)
- rational_indian 2y agoLOL. So you want everyone to become skillful in using weasel words? Spoken like a true weasel.
- readthenotes1 2y agoHuh. I Forgot the /s
- crest 2y agoSure buddy. Just one little thing please tell me where you found a RV64GCV system with comparable throughput as well as throughput per watt instead of a ~100MHz in-order dual-issue toy core that doesn't exist outside FPGAs (and emulation).
- netr0ute 2y agoThe Milk-V Pioneer has 64 out of order cores and supports 128GB of ECC memory!
- SigmundA 2y agoIts Sophon SG2042 SOC has about the same per core performance as an A72 like in a Rpi 4 or Graviton 1 from 2018...
- ramon156 2y agoI don't know why people especially RISC-V to already be on the level ARM and x64 is. The fact RISC-V even exists to begin with is amazing. My opinion is definitely biased, though. Only time will tell
- seanw444 2y agoThe fact that large corporations like Google and Facebook have incentives to have a better alternative to x86 and ARM for the data center is very beneficial too, and can only speed development up.
- yjftsjthsd-h 2y agoI hope so, but it clearly isn't the present, unless you're aware of a RV processor in this league that I don't yet know about?