3 ms·
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_cr.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_... It's more than that. Simply
by alwayslikethis 2y ago
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_cr.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_...
It's more than that. Simply incrementing your way through a 256 bit counter is impossible by the thermodynamic cost alone.
- swijck 2y agoCorrect. Better to get into other forms of cryptography than pointlessly increase the numbers. We need to think more about PQ proofing.
- tatersolid 2y agoAES-256 is already post-quantum secure; what exactly are you suggesting?