4 ms·
I think it's useful to think about the same way you think about test specificity. Ie, of all the people in the world that hit this page, how many of them are go
by SilverBirch 2y ago
I think it's useful to think about the same way you think about test specificity. Ie, of all the people in the world that hit this page, how many of them are going to need this feature and use it correctly vs. how many don't need this feature and accidentally use it. Using the Escape key is fantastic for "I needed this feature and it worked", which is probably 1 in 100,000 users of the page. It's terrible for "I accidentally used this feature I didn't know about" and that's the other 99,999.
All your other suggestions fail for this reason too - you need a high level of confidence the person really intended to escape. I for example would mash the space bar three times to scroll down.
- monkpit 2y agoAlong these lines, in the GitHub discussion they show a graph of the number of times the button was pressed, bucketed by the platform the user was on, which is all utterly useless info. It should be normalized as a percentage of page views at the very least. They’re basically saying “hey we added a big red button and people press it sometimes”. The button could say “fire lasers at my cat” and some amount of people would press it (whether intentional or not).