2 ms·
Not proven ≠ Wrong It's true, a direct link hasn't been proven, and I was debating even mentioning that. Obviously that specific tendency alone isn't indicativ
by farts_mckensy 2y ago
Not proven ≠ Wrong
It's true, a direct link hasn't been proven, and I was debating even mentioning that. Obviously that specific tendency alone isn't indicative of a homicidal individual. But I would speculate that it has something to do with dysfunction/dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system.
- svnt 2y agoYes, but that is the absence of evidence, commonly called on when the science hasn't been done. If a theory/hypothesis remains not proven once the science has been repeatedly done in numerous attempts to prove it, very often it does mean it is wrong.
- farts_mckensy 2y agoA mere two studies are cited in the Wikipedia quote you supplied as evidence of the supposed wrongness of the hypothesis.
- svnt 2y agoWikipedia is not often referenced in literature reviews as an exhaustive source of relevant studies.